![]() IMHO, anything less than that is criminal negligence on a system with important data. You’ll have to decrypt your data and re-encrypt it with VeraCrypt. I use full-disk LUKS (including root partition) on my laptop, and it's gone through many fscks without problems.Īt any rate, you are going to perform at least nightly full backups, aren't you? So a crash should not wipe out a lot of work. ![]() Encryption is always per sector, and disks are written per sector, so usually you'll lose any sectors that weren't written properly, with or without encryption. So I would recommend LUKS (though Truecrypt is a viable option as well).ĭoes TrueCrypt of LUKS offer the best stability / recovery in an event of a crash? you can also place TrueCrypt on an external device and quickly run it on any computer. At any rate, most Linux FS have no Windows driver anyway. Download Portable TrueCrypt 7.1a - A software designed to protect your important data by encrypting it. But that is really only relevant for portable drives/media. True crypt is only portable where you have access to an administator priveleged login. Either that or the truecrypt could be patched so that is erased those tracks after unmounting a drive. Is it possible a tool that found and erased those tracks could be created. The only advantage I can see for Truecrypt is that its Windows support is better, so it's easier to mount a Truecrypt partition under Windows. If Truecrypt leaves tracks then they can be found and erased. I'm not even sure if TrueCrypt can encrypt the root partition at all. It can also maintain an on-the-fly-encrypted volume (data storage device). ![]() ![]() Setting this up by hand can be a bit tricky (though doable), so distro integration helps a lot.Īt least Debian and Ubuntu offer encrypted root via LUKS in the standard installer, so that's a point for LUKS. TrueCrypt is a software designed to protect your important data by encrypting it. For security reasons, you almost certainly want to encrypt all partitions (including /), which is called "encrypted root". Well, as other have pointed out, LUKS is generally better integrated into current distributions. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |